
> Su opinión nos
interesa
|

(solamente en inglés)
International trade in energy resources and products traditionally was
heavily concentrated, cartelised and controlled by a few multinational
companies. Hence the rules of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
(GATT), and now the World Trade Organization (WTO), do not deal with
energy as a distinct sector. It was felt that general rules, including
the disciplines on state trading, could adequately address trade in
energy. However, certain features of the energy sector make it different
from other industries in many ways and we submit existing WTO rules do
not appropriately address all the needs of energy trade today. Ensuring
security of supply and addressing climate change mitigation, creating an
effective incentives mechanism to reduce CO2 emissions are the first
priorities.
The interface of trade and climate change
mitigation and adaptation is at the heart of contemporary legal
developments in energy law. Yet, the challenges of climate change are
merely the tip of the iceberg of unresolved and controversial issues
relating to the status of energy in international law. The picture is
one of fragmentation with multiple instruments involved. The bulk of
regulation comes under domestic law and the role of regional and global
law in addressing energy and secure production and supplies has remained
unclear and unsettled. Doctrines of multilayered governance have hardly
been applied to the sector.
Different and competing forms of energy are
therefore subject to strongly divergent international rules, depending
on whether they qualify as a good or a service. The same applies to the
operation of trade remedies, in particular because of the absence of
disciplines on subsidies in services. Moreover, existing disciplines on
subsidies in goods may not be suitable to address a distinction between
renewable and non-renewable energy under GATT and the Agreement on
Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (ASCM). The Agreement on
Agriculture again offers different disciplines. It thus makes a
fundamental difference whether a product is classified as an industrial
or an agricultural product.
There are also unresolved and basic issues
related to competition policy and thus about the relationship of WTO law
and OPEC as a producer organisation. The crucial question is whether oil
exporters, when they join the WTO, will still be able to support oil
prices through the regulation of oil production, or whether they could
face challenges on the basis of GATT/WTO rules and provisions(1). This
leads to the question of whether additional WTO rules on competition are
required to properly address the relationship between trade and
production in the energy sector.
Finally, the relationship of energy and
government procurement remains unclear. WTO law disciplines on
government procurement seek to facilitate market access and level the
playing fields in purchases of goods and services by governments. The
current rules on government procurement both within and outside the WTO
do not systematically address the linkage to green procurement. There is
therefore controversy as to what extent Members are entitled to
condition government procurement in the light of goals set out in the
Kyoto Protocol.
WTO law thus leaves a number of basic
incoherencies and open questions. They were partly addressed in the
papers and the doctoral projects of Individual Project No. 6 of the NCCR
Trade Regulation and at the World Trade Forum 2007. The main findings
are discussed within the following agenda for reform.
Energy requires an integrated approach and
does not lend itself to sectoral negotiations, depending upon different
forms of energy applied to competing energy sectors. The sector
encompasses fossil and non-fossil fuels and energy including oil, gas,
coal, wood, electricity, and renewable sources of energy production
(solar, wind, wave and tidal), as well as biofuels. All these forms of
energy should be subject to the same rules and thus conditions of
competition. The production and transmission of energy is a complex
operation which often involves both goods and services. It also entails
technology and thus is affected by intellectual property rights. The
sector shows a high level of governmental involvement which calls for
coherent rules on competition and government procurement.
In the effort to enhance coherence and
overcome unnecessary fragmentation in regulating trade in energy, the
problems and the shortcomings identified above can best be addressed by
seeking comprehensive negotiations within the WTO. In much the same way
as the Uruguay Round produced a special agreement on agriculture, we
submit that future negotiations should turn towards work on a
comprehensive sectoral agreement on energy. Negotiations would enable
Members to address all the pertinent problems, ranging from issues of
classification of goods and services, to disciplines on subsidies, to
issues of competition and state trading, as well as intellectual
property rights and government procurement. It allows defining
authoritatively the relationship to other international agreements, in
particular the UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol and future global systems
of emissions trading. It would allow the relationship between trade and
regulation of production, and thus of WTO and OPEC, to be defined.
A comprehensive sectoral agreement on energy,
encompassing both goods and services, would not render the current
structure of the WTO Agreements obsolete. Recourse to a framework
convention implies that its provisions may refer to pertinent provisions
of other agreements of the WTO, in particular GATT and its instruments,
GATS, Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
(TRIPS) and the GPA. This is not new and has been done before, for
example in defining the relationship of the Agreement on the Application
of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) and GATT, or the agreements
on agriculture and on industrial subsidies. They may also incorporate
provisions of agreements outside the scope of the WTO, as did the TRIPS
Agreement for the Paris and Berne Conventions on industrial property and
copyright. Or, they allow reference to other provisions without
incorporating them, for example a future and revised UNFCCC or Kyoto
Protocol. Both reference and incorporation allow the building of a
comprehensive and coherent agreement on energy within the WTO. It is
within such a framework that the following issues and proposals for
reform should be dealt with.
The WTO, with its currently 153 Members
(2), can
make an important contribution to the complex process of energy reform.
More predictable and transparent trade rules could benefit both
energy-importing and energy-exporting countries, and will contribute to
preventing the eruption of energy conflicts.
Notas
1. H.Abdallah, ‘Oil exports under GATT and the
WTO’ OPEC Review 29(4) (2005), 267. back to text
2. As of December 2008.
back to text
Su opinión nos interesa volver al principio
Dénos su opinión sobre los artículos presentados. Pueden pasar algunos
minutos antes de que sus observaciones aparezcan en la página. Es
posible que los caracteres acentuados no se muestren correctamente. Se
considera que al participar en este foro usted ha aceptado las
normas de participación en los foros en línea de la OMC.
|

>
Guía para descargar ficheros
|