
|

The GATS
is the first
and only
set of multilateral rules and commitments covering Government
measures which affect trade in services. It has two parts—the
framework agreement containing
the rules, and the national schedules
of commitments in which each Member specifies the degree of access
it is prepared to guarantee for foreign service suppliers.
The
GATS covers
all
services with two exceptions—i.e. services provided in the
exercise of governmental authority and, in the air transport sector,
air
traffic rights and
all services directly related to the exercise of traffic rights.
Notwithstanding this very broad scope, the Agreement and the
negotiations taking place under it are one of the least controversial
areas of current work in the WTO. This is because of its remarkable
flexibility, which allows Governments, to a very great extent, to
determine the level of obligations they will assume. There are four
main elements of flexibility:
-
Member
Governments choose those service sectors or subsectors on which
they will make commitments guaranteeing the right of foreign
suppliers to provide the service. Each Member must have a schedule
of commitments, but there is no minimum requirement as to its
coverage—some cover only a small part of one sector;
-
For
those services that are committed, Governments may set limitations
specifying the level of market access and the degree of national
treatment they are prepared to guarantee;
-
Governments
were able to limit commitments to one or more of the four
recognized "modes of supply" through which services are
traded. They may also withdraw and renegotiate commitments;
-
In
order to provide more favourable treatment to certain trading
partners, Governments may take exemptions, in principle limited to
10 years’ duration, from the MFN principle, which is otherwise
applicable to all services, whether scheduled or not.
The
Agreement contains a number of general obligations applicable to all
services, the most important of which is the MFN rule. But apart from
these each Member defines its own obligations through the commitments
undertaken in its schedule. Because it is a basic principle of the
Agreement that developing countries are expected to liberalize fewer
sectors and types of transactions, in line with their development
situation, the commitments of developing countries are in general less
extensive than those of more industrialized countries. It was this
flexibility in the scheduling of commitments which put an end to the
north-south controversy over services which marked the early years of
the Uruguay Round.
<
Previous Next
>
|
|