
Contents
> Director-General’s
letter to journalists
> Background
> Least-developed
countries (LDCs)
> Agriculture
> Sanitary
and phytosanitary (SPS) measures
> Trade
in services
> Implementation
issues
> Intellectual
property (TRIPS)
> Textiles
and clothing
> Information
technology (IT) products
> Trade
and environment
> Trade
and investment
> Trade
and competition policy
> Transparency
in government procurement
> Trade
facilitation
> Trade
and labour standards
> Disputes
> Electronic
commerce
> Members
and accession
> Regional
trade agreements
> Some
facts and figures
> Glossary
of terms
|

As government barriers to trade and investment have been reduced,
there have been increasing concerns that the gains from such
liberalization may be thwarted by private anti-competitive practices.
There is also a growing realization that mutually supportive trade and
competition policies can contribute to sound economic development, and
that effective competition policies help to ensure that the benefits
of liberalization and market-based reforms flow through to all
citizens.
Approximately
80 WTO member countries, including some 50 developing and transition
countries, have adopted competition laws, also known as “antitrust”
or “anti-monopoly” laws. Typically, these laws provide remedies to
deal with a range of anti-competitive practices, including price
fixing and other cartel arrangements, abuses of a dominant position or
monopolization, mergers that limit competition, and agreements between
suppliers and distributors (“vertical agreements”) that foreclose
markets to new competitors. The concept of competition “policy”
includes competition laws in addition to other measures aimed at
promoting competition in the national economy, such as sectoral
regulations and privatization policies.
The
WTO Working Group on the Interaction between Trade and Competition
Policy (WGTCP) was established at the Singapore Ministerial Conference
in December 1996 to consider issues raised by members relating to the
interaction of these two policy fields. Since its initial meeting in
July 1997, the Group has examined a wide range of such issues
organized into a Chairman’s Checklist. The approximately 180
submissions received by the Working Group from members thus far attest
to the keen interest that has been shown by members in the subject.
Since
1999, pursuant to a decision by the General Council of the WTO, the
Working Group have been examining the following three topics in
addition to the Checklist of Issues:
-
the
relevance of the fundamental WTO principles of national treatment,
transparency, and most-favoured-nation treatment to competition
policy and vice versa;
-
approaches
to promoting cooperation and communication among members,
including in the field of technical cooperation; and
-
the
contribution of competition policy to achieving the objectives of
the WTO, including the promotion of international trade.
At
the beginning of the year, the Group agreed to also address the
following points, as suggested by delegations:
-
address
concerns by some developing countries regarding both the general
impact of implementing competition policy on their national
economies and the particular implications that a multilateral
framework on competition policy might have for development-related
policies and programmes;
-
continue
to explore the implications, modalities and potential benefits of
enhanced international cooperation, including in the WTO, in
regard to the subject-matter of trade and competition policy; and
-
continuing
focus on the issue of capacity building in the area of competition
law and policy.
While
the relevance of WTO principles to competition policy and the need for
enhanced cooperation among members in addressing anti-competitive
practices were affirmed by a number of members, views differed as to
the need for action at the level of the WTO to enhance the relevance
of competition policy to the multilateral trading system. In
particular, while a number of members expressed support for the
development of a multilateral framework on competition policy in the
WTO, to support the implementation of effective competition policies
by member countries and reduce the potential for conflicts in this
area, others questioned the desirability of such a framework and
favoured bilateral and/or regional approaches to cooperation in this
field.
The
question of the desirability of developing a multilateral framework on
competition policy will now be taken up at the Doha Ministerial
Conference. In the preparations for the conference, a number of
members have renewed the call for a WTO framework to support the
implementation of effective national competition policies by members
and enhance the overall contribution of competition policy to the
multilateral trading system while other members have expressed
continuing objections to negotiations on this matter.
Reflecting
these divergent views, the draft ministerial declaration issued on 26
September 2001 contains two options for a decision to be taken in Doha
on the nature of the future work on competition policy in the WTO:
-
“We
agree to negotiations aimed at enhancing the contribution of
competition policy to international trade and development. To this
end, the negotiations should establish a framework to address the
following elements: core principles, including transparency,
non-discrimination and procedural fairness, and provisions on
hardcore cartels; modalities for voluntary cooperation; and,
support for progressive reinforcement of competition institutions
in developing countries through capacity building. In the course
of negotiations, full account shall be taken of the situation of
developing and least-developed country participants and
appropriate flexibility provided to address them. We commit
ourselves to ensure that appropriate arrangements are made for the
provision of technical assistance and support for capacity
building both during the negotiations and as an element of the
agreement to be negotiated.”
or
|
|